Morocco vs Serbia, Republic of: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Morocco
46.67
in 2013
Serbia, Republic of
46.67
in 2013
Morocco rank
114th
Serbia, Republic of rank
114th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Morocco
- Serbia, Republic of
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 46.67 against 46.67 in Serbia, Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Serbia, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Morocco ranks 114th and Serbia, Republic of ranks 114th of 190 countries.
Serbia, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Serbia, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.67 | 46.67 | 20 | Serbia, Republic of |
| 2010s | 42.5 | 46.67 | 4.17 | Serbia, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Morocco or Serbia, Republic of?
- Morocco, at 46.67 against 46.67 in Serbia, Republic of as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Morocco and Serbia, Republic of?
- 0, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Serbia, Republic of?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Morocco and Serbia, Republic of rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Morocco ranks 114th and Serbia, Republic of ranks 114th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.