Morocco vs Netherlands: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score

Morocco
46.67
in 2013
Netherlands
46.67
in 2013
Morocco rank
113th
Netherlands rank
113th

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Morocco
  • Netherlands
01020304050200520092013

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 46.67 against 46.67 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Netherlands ahead.

Morocco ranks 113th and Netherlands ranks 113th of 188 countries.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco Netherlands Difference Ahead
2000s 26.67 43.33 16.67 Netherlands
2010s 42.5 45 2.5 Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Morocco or Netherlands?
Morocco, at 46.67 against 46.67 in Netherlands as of 2013.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Morocco and Netherlands?
0, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Netherlands?
9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Morocco and Netherlands rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Morocco ranks 113th and Netherlands ranks 113th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,710 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.