Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 46.67 in 2013. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Zimbabwe, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2013, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Zimbabwe stood at 46.67. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Zimbabwe peaked at 46.67 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 46.67, in 2005.
Zimbabwe ranks 115th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 46.67 | — |
| 2006 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 46.67 | +0.0% |
Zimbabwe compared with similar countries
- Zimbabwe's 46.67 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 46.67, 1.0× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Zimbabwe's 46.67 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 38.33, 1.2× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.67 | 46.67 | 46.67 | 5 |
| 2010s | 46.67 | 46.67 | 46.67 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 115 Russia 46.67 compare
- 115 Bahamas 46.67 compare
- 115 Bhutan 46.67 compare
- 115 Bosnia and Herzegovina 46.67 compare
- 115 Croatia 46.67 compare
- 115 Morocco 46.67 compare
- 115 Netherlands 46.67 compare
- 115 Serbia 46.67 compare
- 115 Slovakia 46.67 compare
- 115 Syria 46.67 compare
- 115 Tonga 46.67 compare
- 115 Uganda 46.67 compare
More reference data data for Zimbabwe
- Exchange rate, new LCU per USD extended backward, period average 58,959 (2026)
- Exchange rate, old LCU per USD extended forward, period average 58,959 (2026)
- Official exchange rate, LCU per USD, period average 58,959 (2026)
- Political opposition, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament and government, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled 0 events (2024)
- Annual precipitation, annual growth rate 122.78 % change on previous year (2025)
- Free country, gaps filled 0 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating, gaps filled 5 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Zimbabwe?
- Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Zimbabwe was 46.67 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 46.67 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 46.67 in 2005.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Zimbabwe ranks 115th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.