Croatia vs Syrian Arab Republic: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Croatia
46.67
in 2013
Syrian Arab Republic
46.67
in 2013
Croatia rank
115th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
115th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Croatia
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 46.67 against 46.67 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Croatia ranks 115th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 115th of 191 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.33 | 43.33 | 2 | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 46.67 | 46.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Croatia or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Croatia, at 46.67 against 46.67 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Croatia and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 0, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Croatia and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Croatia ranks 115th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 115th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.