Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Rwanda

Rwanda: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score was 90.98 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
90.98
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
6th
of 191 countries
All-time high
90.98
in 2010
All-time low
77.46
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Rwanda, 2003–2019

0204060801002003201120192003: 77.52004: 77.52005: 84.42006: 84.42007: 84.42008: 84.42009: 88.52010: 912011: 912012: 912013: 912014: 912015: 912016: 912017: 912018: 912019: 91

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Rwanda recorded 90.98 for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

That represents a change of up 2.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Rwanda peaked at 90.98 in 2010 and was at its lowest, 77.46, in 2003.

That places Rwanda 6th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Rwanda, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Rwanda, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 77.46
2004 77.46 +0.0%
2005 84.43 +9.0%
2006 84.43 +0.0%
2007 84.43 +0.0%
2008 84.43 +0.0%
2009 88.52 +4.9%
2010 90.98 +2.8%
2011 90.98 +0.0%
2012 90.98 +0.0%
2013 90.98 +0.0%
2014 90.98 +0.0%
2015 90.98 +0.0%
2016 90.98 +0.0%
2017 90.98 +0.0%
2018 90.98 +0.0%
2019 90.98 +0.0%

Rwanda compared with similar countries

  • Rwanda's 90.98 is above the median for low income countries, which is 57.99, 1.6× the median. (24 countries reporting)
  • Rwanda's 90.98 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 61.89, 1.5× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 83.02 77.46 88.52 7
2010s 90.98 90.98 90.98 10

Countries ranked near Rwanda

  1. 3 Bhutan 91.39 compare
  2. 3 Uzbekistan 91.39 compare
  3. 5 South Sudan 91.15 compare
  4. 7 Belarus 87.3 compare
  5. 8 Azerbaijan 87.13 compare
  6. 9 Georgia 86.48 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Rwanda

All data for Rwanda →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Rwanda?
Enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Rwanda was 90.98 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Rwanda?
The highest recorded value was 90.98 in 2010.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Rwanda?
The lowest recorded value was 77.46 in 2003.
How does Rwanda rank for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Rwanda ranks 6th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score rising or falling in Rwanda?
Over the last ten years it is up 2.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Rwanda data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Rwanda. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/rwanda/">Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Rwanda</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.