Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Australia

Australia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score was 78.12 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
78.12
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
12th
of 184 countries
All-time high
78.12
in 2006
All-time low
75
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Australia, 2003–2014

0204060802003200820142003: 752004: 752005: 752006: 78.12007: 78.12008: 78.12009: 78.12010: 78.12011: 78.12012: 78.12013: 78.12014: 78.1

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Australia recorded 78.12 for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in 2014. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 4.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Australia peaked at 78.12 in 2006 and was at its lowest, 75, in 2003.

That places Australia 12th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the top 10%.

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Australia, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Australia, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 75 —
2004 75 +0.0%
2005 75 +0.0%
2006 78.12 +4.2%
2007 78.12 +0.0%
2008 78.12 +0.0%
2009 78.12 +0.0%
2010 78.12 +0.0%
2011 78.12 +0.0%
2012 78.12 +0.0%
2013 78.12 +0.0%
2014 78.12 +0.0%

Australia compared with similar countries

  • Australia's 78.12 is above the median for high income countries, which is 59.38, 1.3× the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • Australia's 78.12 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 53.12, 1.5× the median. (27 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 76.79 75 78.12 7
2010s 78.12 78.12 78.12 5

Countries ranked near Australia

  1. 9 Czechia 81.25 compare
  2. 9 Iceland 81.25 compare
  3. 9 Latvia 81.25 compare
  4. 12 Botswana 78.12 compare
  5. 14 Belarus 75 compare
  6. 14 France 75 compare
  7. 14 Malaysia 75 compare
  8. 14 South Africa 75 compare
  9. 14 United Kingdom 75 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Australia

All data for Australia →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Australia?
Enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Australia was 78.12 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Australia?
The highest recorded value was 78.12 in 2006.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Australia?
The lowest recorded value was 75 in 2003.
How does Australia rank for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Australia ranks 12th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Australia?
Over the last ten years it is up 4.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Australia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Australia. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/australia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/australia/">Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Australia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.