Australia vs Iceland: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Australia
78.12
in 2014
Iceland
81.25
in 2014
Australia rank
12th
Iceland rank
9th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Australia
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 81.25 against 78.12 in Australia, a difference of 3.13.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 12th and Iceland ranks 9th of 181 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.08 | 81.25 | 4.17 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 78.12 | 81.25 | 3.12 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Australia or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 81.25 against 78.12 in Australia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Australia and Iceland?
- 3.13, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Iceland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Iceland rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Australia ranks 12th and Iceland ranks 9th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.