Australia vs France: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Australia
78.12
in 2014
France
75
in 2014
Australia rank
12th
France rank
14th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Australia
- France
How they compare
Australia currently reports 78.12 against 75 in France, a difference of 3.12.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was France ahead.
Australia ranks 12th and France ranks 14th of 181 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | France | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.79 | 75 | 1.79 | Australia |
| 2010s | 78.12 | 75 | 3.12 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Australia or France?
- Australia, at 78.12 against 75 in France as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Australia and France?
- 3.12, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and France?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Australia and France rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Australia ranks 12th and France ranks 14th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.