Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Latvia

Latvia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score was 81.25 in 2014. ▲ Rising

Latest (2014)
81.25
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
9th
of 184 countries
All-time high
81.25
in 2005
All-time low
71.88
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Latvia, 2003–2014

0204060802003200820142003: 71.92004: 71.92005: 81.22006: 81.22007: 81.22008: 81.22009: 81.22010: 81.22011: 81.22012: 81.22013: 81.22014: 81.2

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Latvia recorded 81.25 for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in 2014. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

That represents a change of up 13.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Latvia peaked at 81.25 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 71.88, in 2003.

That places Latvia 9th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Latvia, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Latvia, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 71.88 —
2004 71.88 +0.0%
2005 81.25 +13.0%
2006 81.25 +0.0%
2007 81.25 +0.0%
2008 81.25 +0.0%
2009 81.25 +0.0%
2010 81.25 +0.0%
2011 81.25 +0.0%
2012 81.25 +0.0%
2013 81.25 +0.0%
2014 81.25 +0.0%

Latvia compared with similar countries

  • Latvia's 81.25 is above the median for high income countries, which is 59.38, 1.4× the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • Latvia's 81.25 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 59.38, 1.4× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 78.57 71.88 81.25 7
2010s 81.25 81.25 81.25 5

Countries ranked near Latvia

  1. 9 Czechia 81.25 compare
  2. 9 Iceland 81.25 compare
  3. 12 Australia 78.12 compare
  4. 12 Botswana 78.12 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Latvia

All data for Latvia →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Latvia?
Enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Latvia was 81.25 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Latvia?
The highest recorded value was 81.25 in 2005.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Latvia?
The lowest recorded value was 71.88 in 2003.
How does Latvia rank for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Latvia ranks 9th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Latvia?
Over the last ten years it is up 13.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Latvia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Latvia. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/latvia/">Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Latvia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.