Australia vs Latvia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Australia
78.12
in 2014
Latvia
81.25
in 2014
Australia rank
12th
Latvia rank
9th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Australia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 81.25 against 78.12 in Australia, a difference of 3.13.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 12th and Latvia ranks 9th of 181 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.79 | 78.57 | 1.79 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 78.12 | 81.25 | 3.12 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Australia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 81.25 against 78.12 in Australia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Australia and Latvia?
- 3.13, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Latvia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Latvia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Australia ranks 12th and Latvia ranks 9th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.