Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Belarus

Belarus: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score was 75 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
75
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
14th
of 184 countries
All-time high
78.12
in 2003
All-time low
75
in 2011
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Belarus, 2003–2014

0204060802003200820142003: 78.12004: 78.12005: 78.12006: 78.12007: 78.12008: 78.12009: 78.12010: 78.12011: 752012: 752013: 752014: 75

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 75 for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in 2014. That is the lowest value across all 12 years on record.

That represents a change of down 4.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Belarus peaked at 78.12 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 75, in 2011.

Belarus ranks 14th of 184 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Belarus, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 78.12 —
2004 78.12 +0.0%
2005 78.12 +0.0%
2006 78.12 +0.0%
2007 78.12 +0.0%
2008 78.12 +0.0%
2009 78.12 +0.0%
2010 78.12 +0.0%
2011 75 -4.0%
2012 75 +0.0%
2013 75 +0.0%
2014 75 +0.0%

Belarus compared with similar countries

  • Belarus's 75 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 50, 1.5× the median. (55 countries reporting)
  • Belarus's 75 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 59.38, 1.3× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 78.12 78.12 78.12 7
2010s 75.62 75 78.12 5

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 12 Australia 78.12 compare
  2. 12 Botswana 78.12 compare
  3. 14 France 75 compare
  4. 14 Malaysia 75 compare
  5. 14 South Africa 75 compare
  6. 14 United Kingdom 75 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Belarus?
Enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Belarus was 75 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 78.12 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 75 in 2011.
How does Belarus rank for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Belarus ranks 14th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is down 4.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Belarus. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/belarus/">Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.