Australia vs Malaysia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Australia
78.12
in 2014
Malaysia
75
in 2014
Australia rank
12th
Malaysia rank
14th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Australia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 78.12 against 75 in Malaysia, a difference of 3.12.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 12th and Malaysia ranks 14th of 181 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.79 | 71.88 | 4.91 | Australia |
| 2010s | 78.12 | 74.38 | 3.75 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Australia or Malaysia?
- Australia, at 78.12 against 75 in Malaysia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Australia and Malaysia?
- 3.12, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Malaysia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Malaysia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Australia ranks 12th and Malaysia ranks 14th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.