What is the highest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Micronesia (country)?

The highest recorded value was 29.39 in 2015.

What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Micronesia (country)?

The lowest recorded value was 29.39 in 2015.

How does Micronesia (country) rank for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?

Micronesia (country) ranks 182nd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Where does this Micronesia (country) data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Micronesia (country)

Name: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Micronesia (country)
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Micronesia (country): Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score was 29.39 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

29.39

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

182nd

of 188 countries

All-time high

29.39

in 2015

All-time low

29.39

in 2015

Years of data

2015–2019

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Micronesia (country), 2015–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score in Micronesia (country) is 29.39, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over five years.

That places Micronesia (country) 182nd out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Micronesia (country)

179 Afghanistan 31.76 compare
180 Cambodia 31.75 compare
181 Central African Republic 31.39 compare
183 Sao Tome and Principe 28.84 compare
184 Angola 28.11 compare
185 Myanmar 26.39 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Micronesia (country)

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0003 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 16.58 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 0.0232 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 20.76 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.0018 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 1.05 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 3.01 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 1.94 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 16.58 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.0074 (2050)

All data for Micronesia (country) →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score in Micronesia (country)?: Enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score in Micronesia (country) was 29.39 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Micronesia (country)?: The highest recorded value was 29.39 in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Micronesia (country)?: The lowest recorded value was 29.39 in 2015.
How does Micronesia (country) rank for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?: Micronesia (country) ranks 182nd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Micronesia (country) data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.