Micronesia (country) vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 29.39 against 28.84 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.55.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Micronesia (country) ranks 182nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 183rd of 188 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Micronesia (country) or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Micronesia (country), at 29.39 against 28.84 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Micronesia (country) and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.55, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 182nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 183rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.