What is the highest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Central African Republic?

The highest recorded value was 31.39 in 2018.

What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Central African Republic?

The lowest recorded value was 30.46 in 2015.

How does Central African Republic rank for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?

Central African Republic ranks 181st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Where does this Central African Republic data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Central African Republic

Name: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Central African Republic
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Central African Republic: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score was 31.39 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

31.39

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

181st

of 188 countries

All-time high

31.39

in 2018

All-time low

30.46

in 2015

Years of data

2015–2019

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Central African Republic, 2015–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score in Central African Republic is 31.39, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is up 3.0% over five years.

That places Central African Republic 181st out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Central African Republic

178 Gabon 32.84 compare
179 Afghanistan 31.76 compare
180 Cambodia 31.75 compare
182 Micronesia (country) 29.39 compare
183 Sao Tome and Principe 28.84 compare
184 Angola 28.11 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Central African Republic

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.26 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.03 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.26 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1959 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0271 (2050)
Summer temperature anomalies 0.8218 °C (2026)
Temperature anomalies by month 1.51 °C (2026)
Spring temperature anomalies -0.1622 °C (2026)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation 8,636 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues 30.03 (2050)

All data for Central African Republic →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score in Central African Republic?: Enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score in Central African Republic was 31.39 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Central African Republic?: The highest recorded value was 31.39 in 2018.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Central African Republic?: The lowest recorded value was 30.46 in 2015.
How does Central African Republic rank for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?: Central African Republic ranks 181st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Central African Republic data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.