What is the highest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?

The highest recorded value was 30.28 in 2015.

What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?

The lowest recorded value was 27 in 2017.

How does Sao Tome and Principe rank for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 183rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Where does this Sao Tome and Principe data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Sao Tome and Principe

Name: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Sao Tome and Principe
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Sao Tome and Principe: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score was 28.84 in 2019. ▼ Falling

Latest (2019)

28.84

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

183rd

of 188 countries

All-time high

30.28

in 2015

All-time low

in 2017

Years of data

2015–2019

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Sao Tome and Principe, 2015–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Sao Tome and Principe recorded 28.84 for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score in 2019.

The figure is down 4.8% over five years.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 183rd of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Sao Tome and Principe

180 Cambodia 31.75 compare
181 Central African Republic 31.39 compare
182 Micronesia (country) 29.39 compare
184 Angola 28.11 compare
185 Myanmar 26.39 compare
186 Suriname 25.94 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Sao Tome and Principe

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 15.92 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0038 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0601 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 8.45 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 3.71 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 3.35 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0319 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0015 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0126 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0001 (2050)

All data for Sao Tome and Principe →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score in Sao Tome and Principe?: Enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score in Sao Tome and Principe was 28.84 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?: The highest recorded value was 30.28 in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?: The lowest recorded value was 27 in 2017.
How does Sao Tome and Principe rank for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?: Sao Tome and Principe ranks 183rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Sao Tome and Principe data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.