Micronesia (country) vs Myanmar: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Myanmar
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 29.39 against 26.39 in Myanmar, a difference of 3.
That makes Micronesia (country)'s figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Micronesia (country) has been ahead every year.
Micronesia (country) ranks 182nd and Myanmar ranks 185th of 188 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Micronesia (country) or Myanmar?
- Micronesia (country), at 29.39 against 26.39 in Myanmar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Micronesia (country) and Myanmar?
- 3, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Myanmar?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Myanmar rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 182nd and Myanmar ranks 185th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.