Afghanistan vs Micronesia (country): Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Afghanistan
- Micronesia (country)
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 31.76 against 29.39 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 2.37.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Micronesia (country)'s.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 179th and Micronesia (country) ranks 182nd of 188 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Afghanistan or Micronesia (country)?
- Afghanistan, at 31.76 against 29.39 in Micronesia (country) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Afghanistan and Micronesia (country)?
- 2.37, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Micronesia (country)?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and Micronesia (country) rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Afghanistan ranks 179th and Micronesia (country) ranks 182nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.