Cambodia vs Micronesia (country): Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Cambodia
31.75
in 2019
Micronesia (country)
29.39
in 2019
Cambodia rank
180th
Micronesia (country) rank
182nd

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cambodia
  • Micronesia (country)
0102030201520172019

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 31.75 against 29.39 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 2.36.

That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Micronesia (country)'s.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.

Cambodia ranks 180th and Micronesia (country) ranks 182nd of 188 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Cambodia or Micronesia (country)?
Cambodia, at 31.75 against 29.39 in Micronesia (country) as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Cambodia and Micronesia (country)?
2.36, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Micronesia (country)?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Cambodia and Micronesia (country) rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Cambodia ranks 180th and Micronesia (country) ranks 182nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.