Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Peru

Peru: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score was 53.97 in 2014. ▲ Rising

Latest (2014)
53.97
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
108th
of 184 countries
All-time high
55.34
in 2009
All-time low
50.99
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Peru, 2003–2014

02040602003200820142003: 512004: 512005: 512006: 54.22007: 54.22008: 54.22009: 55.32010: 55.32011: 55.32012: 53.92013: 542014: 54

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Peru stood at 53.97.

The figure is up 5.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Peru peaked at 55.34 in 2009 and was at its lowest, 50.99, in 2003.

Peru ranks 108th of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Peru, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Peru, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 50.99
2004 50.99 +0.0%
2005 50.99 +0.0%
2006 54.25 +6.4%
2007 54.25 +0.0%
2008 54.25 +0.0%
2009 55.34 +2.0%
2010 55.34 +0.0%
2011 55.34 +0.0%
2012 53.92 -2.6%
2013 53.97 +0.1%
2014 53.97 +0.0%

Peru compared with similar countries

  • Peru's 53.97 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 57.62, 94% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
  • Peru's 53.97 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 54.47, 99% of the median. (32 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 53.01 50.99 55.34 7
2010s 54.51 53.92 55.34 5

Countries ranked near Peru

  1. 105 Maldives 54.78 compare
  2. 106 Palestine 54.48 compare
  3. 107 Jordan 54.04 compare
  4. 109 Lesotho 53.94 compare
  5. 110 Algeria 52.93 compare
  6. 111 Israel 52.61 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Peru

All data for Peru →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Peru?
Enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Peru was 53.97 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Peru?
The highest recorded value was 55.34 in 2009.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Peru?
The lowest recorded value was 50.99 in 2003.
How does Peru rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Peru ranks 108th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Peru?
Over the last ten years it is up 5.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Peru data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Peru. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/peru/">Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Peru</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.