Algeria vs Peru: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Algeria
52.93
in 2014
Peru
53.97
in 2014
Algeria rank
110th
Peru rank
108th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Algeria
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 53.97 against 52.93 in Algeria, a difference of 1.04.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Algeria ranks 110th and Peru ranks 108th of 181 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.39 | 53.01 | 2.62 | Peru |
| 2010s | 52.33 | 54.51 | 2.18 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Algeria or Peru?
- Peru, at 53.97 against 52.93 in Algeria as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Algeria and Peru?
- 1.04, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Peru?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Algeria and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Algeria ranks 110th and Peru ranks 108th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.