Israel vs Peru: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Israel
52.61
in 2014
Peru
53.97
in 2014
Israel rank
111th
Peru rank
108th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Israel
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 53.97 against 52.61 in Israel, a difference of 1.36.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 111th and Peru ranks 108th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.93 | 53.01 | 1.92 | Israel |
| 2010s | 53.54 | 54.51 | 0.974 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Israel or Peru?
- Peru, at 53.97 against 52.61 in Israel as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Israel and Peru?
- 1.36, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Peru?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Israel and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Israel ranks 111th and Peru ranks 108th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.