Peru vs Palestine: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Peru
53.97
in 2014
Palestine
54.48
in 2014
Peru rank
108th
Palestine rank
106th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Peru
- Palestine
How they compare
Palestine currently reports 54.48 against 53.97 in Peru, a difference of 0.51.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 108th and Palestine ranks 106th of 181 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.35 | 50.56 | 2.78 | Peru |
| 2010s | 54.51 | 54.48 | 0.0302 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Peru or Palestine?
- Palestine, at 54.48 against 53.97 in Peru as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Peru and Palestine?
- 0.51, with Palestine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Palestine?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Peru and Palestine rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Peru ranks 108th and Palestine ranks 106th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.