Jordan vs Peru: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Jordan
54.04
in 2014
Peru
53.97
in 2014
Jordan rank
107th
Peru rank
108th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Jordan
- Peru
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 54.04 against 53.97 in Peru, a difference of 0.07.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 107th and Peru ranks 108th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.04 | 53.01 | 1.03 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 54.04 | 54.51 | 0.4677 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Jordan or Peru?
- Jordan, at 54.04 against 53.97 in Peru as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Jordan and Peru?
- 0.07, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Peru?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Jordan and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Jordan ranks 107th and Peru ranks 108th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.