How does Jordan rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?

Jordan ranks 107th out of 181 countries with data for 2014.

Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Jordan?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Jordan data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Jordan

Name: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Jordan
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Jordan: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score was 54.04 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)

54.04

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

107th

of 181 countries

All-time high

54.04

in 2003

All-time low

54.04

in 2003

Years of data

2003–2014

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Jordan, 2003–2014

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Jordan stood at 54.04. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Jordan peaked at 54.04 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 54.04, in 2003.

That places Jordan 107th out of 181 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
2000s	54.04	54.04	54.04	7
2010s	54.04	54.04	54.04	5

Countries ranked near Jordan

104 Jamaica 54.96 compare
105 Maldives 54.78 compare
106 Palestine 54.48 compare
108 Peru 53.97 compare
109 Lesotho 53.94 compare
110 Algeria 52.93 compare

See the full ranking of 183 places →

More reference data data for Jordan

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0464 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.425 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.7273 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0055 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.7273 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1557 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0557 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.04 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0299 (2050)

All data for Jordan →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Jordan?: Enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Jordan was 54.04 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Jordan?: The highest recorded value was 54.04 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Jordan?: The lowest recorded value was 54.04 in 2003.
How does Jordan rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?: Jordan ranks 107th out of 181 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Jordan?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Jordan data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.