Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Jordan

Jordan: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score was 54.04 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
54.04
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
107th
of 184 countries
All-time high
54.04
in 2003
All-time low
54.04
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Jordan, 2003–2014

02040602003200820142003: 542004: 542005: 542006: 542007: 542008: 542009: 542010: 542011: 542012: 542013: 542014: 54

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Jordan stood at 54.04. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Jordan peaked at 54.04 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 54.04, in 2003.

That places Jordan 107th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Jordan, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Jordan, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 54.04 —
2004 54.04 +0.0%
2005 54.04 +0.0%
2006 54.04 +0.0%
2007 54.04 +0.0%
2008 54.04 +0.0%
2009 54.04 +0.0%
2010 54.04 +0.0%
2011 54.04 +0.0%
2012 54.04 +0.0%
2013 54.04 +0.0%
2014 54.04 +0.0%

Jordan compared with similar countries

  • Jordan's 54.04 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 57.62, 94% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
  • Jordan's 54.04 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 52.61, 1.0× the median. (21 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 54.04 54.04 54.04 7
2010s 54.04 54.04 54.04 5

Countries ranked near Jordan

  1. 104 Jamaica 54.96 compare
  2. 105 Maldives 54.78 compare
  3. 106 Palestine 54.48 compare
  4. 108 Peru 53.97 compare
  5. 109 Lesotho 53.94 compare
  6. 110 Algeria 52.93 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Jordan

All data for Jordan →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Jordan?
Enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Jordan was 54.04 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Jordan?
The highest recorded value was 54.04 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Jordan?
The lowest recorded value was 54.04 in 2003.
How does Jordan rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Jordan ranks 107th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Jordan?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Jordan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Jordan. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/jordan/">Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Jordan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.