Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Kiribati

Kiribati: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score was 64.15 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
64.15
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
54th
of 184 countries
All-time high
64.15
in 2003
All-time low
64.14
in 2007
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Kiribati, 2003–2014

02040602003200820142003: 64.22004: 64.22005: 64.22006: 64.22007: 64.12008: 64.22009: 64.22010: 64.22011: 64.22012: 64.22013: 64.22014: 64.2

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Kiribati stood at 64.15. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Kiribati peaked at 64.15 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 64.14, in 2007.

That places Kiribati 54th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Kiribati, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Kiribati, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 64.15
2004 64.15 +0.0%
2005 64.15 +0.0%
2006 64.15 +0.0%
2007 64.14 -0.0%
2008 64.15 +0.0%
2009 64.15 +0.0%
2010 64.15 +0.0%
2011 64.15 +0.0%
2012 64.15 +0.0%
2013 64.15 +0.0%
2014 64.15 +0.0%

Kiribati compared with similar countries

  • Kiribati's 64.15 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 51.38, 1.2× the median. (46 countries reporting)
  • Kiribati's 64.15 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 62.95, 1.0× the median. (27 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 64.15 64.14 64.15 7
2010s 64.15 64.15 64.15 5

Countries ranked near Kiribati

  1. 51 Poland 64.83 compare
  2. 52 Namibia 64.82 compare
  3. 53 Bulgaria 64.27 compare
  4. 55 Chile 63.86 compare
  5. 56 Mexico 63.84 compare
  6. 57 Iran 63.35 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Kiribati

All data for Kiribati →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Kiribati?
Enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Kiribati was 64.15 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Kiribati?
The highest recorded value was 64.15 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Kiribati?
The lowest recorded value was 64.14 in 2007.
How does Kiribati rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Kiribati ranks 54th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Kiribati?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Kiribati data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Kiribati. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/kiribati/">Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Kiribati</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.