Kiribati vs Poland: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Kiribati
64.15
in 2014
Poland
64.83
in 2014
Kiribati rank
54th
Poland rank
51st
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Kiribati
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 64.83 against 64.15 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.68.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 54th and Poland ranks 51st of 181 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.15 | 54.35 | 9.8 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 64.15 | 61.66 | 2.49 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Kiribati or Poland?
- Poland, at 64.83 against 64.15 in Kiribati as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Kiribati and Poland?
- 0.68, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Poland?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Kiribati and Poland rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Kiribati ranks 54th and Poland ranks 51st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.