Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Chile

Chile: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score was 63.86 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
63.86
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
55th
of 184 countries
All-time high
63.86
in 2003
All-time low
63.86
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Chile, 2003–2014

02040602003200820142003: 63.92004: 63.92005: 63.92006: 63.92007: 63.92008: 63.92009: 63.92010: 63.92011: 63.92012: 63.92013: 63.92014: 63.9

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Chile recorded 63.86 for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in 2014. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Chile peaked at 63.86 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 63.86, in 2003.

Chile ranks 55th of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Chile, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Chile, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 63.86
2004 63.86 +0.0%
2005 63.86 +0.0%
2006 63.86 +0.0%
2007 63.86 +0.0%
2008 63.86 +0.0%
2009 63.86 +0.0%
2010 63.86 +0.0%
2011 63.86 +0.0%
2012 63.86 +0.0%
2013 63.86 +0.0%
2014 63.86 +0.0%

Chile compared with similar countries

  • Chile's 63.86 is below the median for high income countries, which is 64.27, 99% of the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • Chile's 63.86 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 54.47, 1.2× the median. (32 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 63.86 63.86 63.86 7
2010s 63.86 63.86 63.86 5

Countries ranked near Chile

  1. 52 Namibia 64.82 compare
  2. 53 Bulgaria 64.27 compare
  3. 54 Kiribati 64.15 compare
  4. 56 Mexico 63.84 compare
  5. 57 Iran 63.35 compare
  6. 58 Equatorial Guinea 63.23 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Chile

All data for Chile →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Chile?
Enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Chile was 63.86 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Chile?
The highest recorded value was 63.86 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Chile?
The lowest recorded value was 63.86 in 2003.
How does Chile rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Chile ranks 55th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Chile?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Chile data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Chile. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/chile/">Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Chile</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.