Kiribati vs Mexico: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Kiribati
64.15
in 2014
Mexico
63.84
in 2014
Kiribati rank
54th
Mexico rank
56th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Kiribati
- Mexico
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 64.15 against 63.84 in Mexico, a difference of 0.31.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 54th and Mexico ranks 56th of 181 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.15 | 62.27 | 1.88 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 64.15 | 62.99 | 1.16 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Kiribati or Mexico?
- Kiribati, at 64.15 against 63.84 in Mexico as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Kiribati and Mexico?
- 0.31, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Mexico?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Kiribati and Mexico rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Kiribati ranks 54th and Mexico ranks 56th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.