Kiribati vs Namibia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Kiribati
64.15
in 2014
Namibia
64.82
in 2014
Kiribati rank
54th
Namibia rank
52nd
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Kiribati
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 64.82 against 64.15 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.67.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 54th and Namibia ranks 52nd of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.15 | 63.73 | 0.4185 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 64.15 | 64.17 | 0.0176 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Kiribati or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 64.82 against 64.15 in Kiribati as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Kiribati and Namibia?
- 0.67, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Namibia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Kiribati and Namibia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Kiribati ranks 54th and Namibia ranks 52nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.