How does Mexico rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?

Mexico ranks 56th out of 181 countries with data for 2014.

Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Mexico?

Over the last ten years it is up 2.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Mexico data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Mexico

Name: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Mexico
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Mexico: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score was 63.84 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)

63.84

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

56th

of 181 countries

All-time high

63.84

in 2013

All-time low

62.27

in 2007

Years of data

2003–2014

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Mexico, 2003–2014

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Mexico stood at 63.84. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

The figure is up 2.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Mexico peaked at 63.84 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 62.27, in 2007.

That places Mexico 56th out of 181 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
2000s	62.27	62.27	62.27	7
2010s	62.99	62.27	63.84	5

Countries ranked near Mexico

53 Bulgaria 64.27 compare
54 Kiribati 64.15 compare
55 Chile 63.86 compare
57 Iran 63.35 compare
58 Equatorial Guinea 63.23 compare
59 Botswana 63.07 compare

See the full ranking of 183 places →

More reference data data for Mexico

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.11 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 16.66 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 32.65 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.75 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 32.65 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 13.78 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 7.36 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 84.69 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 157.18 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.55 (2050)

All data for Mexico →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Mexico?: Enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Mexico was 63.84 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Mexico?: The highest recorded value was 63.84 in 2013.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Mexico?: The lowest recorded value was 62.27 in 2007.
How does Mexico rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?: Mexico ranks 56th out of 181 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Mexico?: Over the last ten years it is up 2.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Mexico data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.