Iran vs Kiribati: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Iran
63.35
in 2014
Kiribati
64.15
in 2014
Iran rank
57th
Kiribati rank
54th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Iran
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 64.15 against 63.35 in Iran, a difference of 0.8.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Iran ranks 57th and Kiribati ranks 54th of 181 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.94 | 64.15 | 1.21 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 63.35 | 64.15 | 0.7988 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Iran or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 64.15 against 63.35 in Iran as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Iran and Kiribati?
- 0.8, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Kiribati?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Iran and Kiribati rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Iran ranks 57th and Kiribati ranks 54th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.