Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Samoa
Samoa: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) was 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Samoa, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Samoa stood at 0.5 DB17-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over five years.
Samoa ranks 90th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Samoa, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 0.5 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 0.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Samoa compared with similar countries
- Samoa's 0.5 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1 DB17-20 methodology, 50% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Samoa's 0.5 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 1 DB17-20 methodology, 50% of the median. (28 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Samoa
- 89 Indonesia 0.61 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Bangladesh 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Pakistan 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Mexico 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Bahamas 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Barbados 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Costa Rica 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 El Salvador 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Eswatini 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Fiji 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Guatemala 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Ireland 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Jamaica 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Kenya 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Kiribati 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Lesotho 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Luxembourg 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Marshall Islands 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Micronesia (country) 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Seychelles 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 South Africa 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Sri Lanka 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Tonga 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Trinidad and Tobago 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Uganda 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Vanuatu 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Zambia 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Zimbabwe 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Samoa
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.023 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0165 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0396 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0396 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.077 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0626 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0918 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2319 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.1693 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Samoa?
- Enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Samoa was 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Samoa?
- The highest recorded value was 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Samoa?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Samoa rank for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Samoa ranks 90th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Samoa data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.