Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology) in Kiribati
Kiribati: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology) was 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Kiribati, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Kiribati is 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over five years.
That places Kiribati 90th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology) in Kiribati, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 0.5 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 0.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Kiribati compared with similar countries
- Kiribati's 0.5 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 1 DB17-20 methodology, 50% of the median. (28 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Kiribati
- 89 Indonesia 0.61 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Bangladesh 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Pakistan 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Mexico 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Bahamas 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Barbados 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Costa Rica 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 El Salvador 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Eswatini 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Fiji 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Guatemala 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Ireland 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Jamaica 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Kenya 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Lesotho 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Luxembourg 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Marshall Islands 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Micronesia (country) 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Samoa 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Seychelles 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 South Africa 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Sri Lanka 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Tonga 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Trinidad and Tobago 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Uganda 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Vanuatu 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Zambia 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Zimbabwe 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Kiribati
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0143 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation 0.7542 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0007 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0143 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils 5.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0136 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 2.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 7.64 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 5.13 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 20.06 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Kiribati?
- Enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Kiribati was 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Kiribati?
- The highest recorded value was 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Kiribati?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Kiribati rank for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Kiribati ranks 90th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Kiribati data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.