Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Guatemala
Guatemala: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) was 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Guatemala, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
Guatemala recorded 0.5 DB17-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.
Guatemala ranks 90th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Countries ranked near Guatemala
- 89 Indonesia 0.61 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Bangladesh 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Pakistan 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Mexico 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Bahamas 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Barbados 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Costa Rica 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 El Salvador 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Eswatini 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Fiji 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Ireland 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Jamaica 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Kenya 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Kiribati 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Lesotho 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Luxembourg 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Marshall Islands 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Micronesia (country) 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Samoa 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Seychelles 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 South Africa 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Sri Lanka 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Tonga 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Trinidad and Tobago 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Uganda 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Vanuatu 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Zambia 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Zimbabwe 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Guatemala
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9286 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 12.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 310.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 18.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1246 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 294.97 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 60.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentat 8,259 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.39 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Guatemala?
- Enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Guatemala was 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Guatemala rank for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Guatemala ranks 90th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.