Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Zambia
Zambia: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) was 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Zambia, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
Zambia recorded 0.5 DB17-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
That places Zambia 90th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Zambia, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 0 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 0 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2017 | 0 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2018 | 0.5 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2019 | 0.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near Zambia
- 89 Indonesia 0.61 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Bangladesh 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Pakistan 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Mexico 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Bahamas 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Barbados 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Costa Rica 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 El Salvador 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Eswatini 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Fiji 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Guatemala 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Ireland 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Jamaica 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Kenya 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Kiribati 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Lesotho 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Luxembourg 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Marshall Islands 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Micronesia (country) 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Samoa 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Seychelles 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 South Africa 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Sri Lanka 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Tonga 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Trinidad and Tobago 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Uganda 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Vanuatu 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Zimbabwe 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Zambia
- Exchange rate, new LCU per USD extended backward, period average 18.94 (2026)
- Exchange rate, old LCU per USD extended forward, period average 18.94 (2026)
- Official exchange rate, LCU per USD, period average 18.94 (2026)
- Political opposition, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament and government, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled 0 events (2025)
- Annual precipitation, annual growth rate 40.84 % change on previous year (2025)
- Free country, gaps filled 1 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating, gaps filled 4 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Zambia?
- Enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Zambia was 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Zambia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2018.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Zambia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Zambia rank for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Zambia ranks 90th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Zambia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.