Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Uganda
Uganda: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) was 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Uganda, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Uganda is 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over five years.
Uganda ranks 90th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Uganda, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 0.5 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 0.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near Uganda
- 89 Indonesia 0.61 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Bangladesh 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Pakistan 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Mexico 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Bahamas 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Barbados 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Costa Rica 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 El Salvador 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Eswatini 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Fiji 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Guatemala 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Ireland 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Jamaica 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Kenya 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Kiribati 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Lesotho 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Luxembourg 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Marshall Islands 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Micronesia (country) 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Samoa 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Seychelles 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 South Africa 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Sri Lanka 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Tonga 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Trinidad and Tobago 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Vanuatu 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Zambia 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 90 Zimbabwe 0.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Uganda
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4214 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.13 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 29.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 42.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.29 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Uganda?
- Enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Uganda was 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Uganda?
- The highest recorded value was 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Uganda?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Uganda rank for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Uganda ranks 90th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Uganda data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.