Costa Rica vs Samoa: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)
Costa Rica
0.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Samoa
0.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
90th
Samoa rank
90th
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time
- Costa Rica
- Samoa
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0.5 DB17-20 methodology against 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in Samoa, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 90th and Samoa ranks 90th of 190 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Costa Rica or Samoa?
- Costa Rica, at 0.5 DB17-20 methodology against 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Costa Rica and Samoa?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Samoa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Samoa rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Costa Rica ranks 90th and Samoa ranks 90th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.