Guatemala vs Samoa: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)
Guatemala
0.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Samoa
0.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Guatemala rank
90th
Samoa rank
90th
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time
- Guatemala
- Samoa
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 0.5 DB17-20 methodology against 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in Samoa, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 90th and Samoa ranks 90th of 188 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Guatemala or Samoa?
- Guatemala, at 0.5 DB17-20 methodology against 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Guatemala and Samoa?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Samoa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Guatemala and Samoa rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Guatemala ranks 90th and Samoa ranks 90th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.