Mozambique vs Rwanda: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Mozambique
40.2%
in 2019
Rwanda
27.4%
in 2019
Mozambique rank
173rd
Rwanda rank
176th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Mozambique
- Rwanda
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 40.2% against 27.4% in Rwanda, a difference of 12.8%.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.5 times Rwanda's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.
Mozambique ranks 173rd and Rwanda ranks 176th of 190 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.2% | 9.6% | 30.6% | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 40.2% | 20.7% | 19.4% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Mozambique or Rwanda?
- Mozambique, at 40.2% against 27.4% in Rwanda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Mozambique and Rwanda?
- 12.8%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Rwanda?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Mozambique and Rwanda rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Mozambique ranks 173rd and Rwanda ranks 176th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.