Rwanda vs Vanuatu: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Rwanda
27.4%
in 2019
Vanuatu
37.1%
in 2019
Rwanda rank
174th
Vanuatu rank
172nd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Rwanda
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Vanuatu currently reports 37.1% against 27.4% in Rwanda, a difference of 9.7%.
That makes Vanuatu's figure about 1.4 times Rwanda's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Vanuatu has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 174th and Vanuatu ranks 172nd of 188 countries.
Vanuatu has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.6% | 37.1% | 27.6% | Vanuatu |
| 2010s | 20.7% | 37.1% | 16.4% | Vanuatu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Rwanda or Vanuatu?
- Vanuatu, at 37.1% against 27.4% in Rwanda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Rwanda and Vanuatu?
- 9.7%, with Vanuatu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Vanuatu?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Rwanda and Vanuatu rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Rwanda ranks 174th and Vanuatu ranks 172nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.