Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Bangladesh
25.0%
in 2019
Rwanda
27.4%
in 2019
Bangladesh rank
180th
Rwanda rank
177th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Bangladesh
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 27.4% against 25.0% in Bangladesh, a difference of 2.4%.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 180th and Rwanda ranks 177th of 191 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.0% | 9.6% | 15.4% | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 25.0% | 20.7% | 4.3% | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Bangladesh or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 27.4% against 25.0% in Bangladesh as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Bangladesh and Rwanda?
- 2.4%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Rwanda?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bangladesh and Rwanda rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Bangladesh ranks 180th and Rwanda ranks 177th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.