Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Peru

Peru: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score was 53.8% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
53.8%
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
152nd
of 191 countries
All-time high
53.8%
in 2003
All-time low
53.8%
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Peru, 2003–2019

02040602003201120192003: 53.82004: 53.82005: 53.82006: 53.82007: 53.82008: 53.82009: 53.82010: 53.82011: 53.82012: 53.82013: 53.82014: 53.82015: 53.82016: 53.82017: 53.82018: 53.82019: 53.8

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Peru recorded 53.8% for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Peru peaked at 53.8% in 2003 and was at its lowest, 53.8%, in 2003.

That places Peru 152nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Peru, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Peru, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 53.8% —
2004 53.8% +0.0%
2005 53.8% +0.0%
2006 53.8% +0.0%
2007 53.8% +0.0%
2008 53.8% +0.0%
2009 53.8% +0.0%
2010 53.8% +0.0%
2011 53.8% +0.0%
2012 53.8% +0.0%
2013 53.8% +0.0%
2014 53.8% +0.0%
2015 53.8% +0.0%
2016 53.8% +0.0%
2017 53.8% +0.0%
2018 53.8% +0.0%
2019 53.8% +0.0%

Peru compared with similar countries

  • Peru's 53.8% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 67.7%, 79% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Peru's 53.8% is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 66.4%, 81% of the median. (33 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 53.8% 53.8% 53.8% 7
2010s 53.8% 53.8% 53.8% 10

Countries ranked near Peru

  1. 149 Serbia 55.6% compare
  2. 150 Botswana 55.3% compare
  3. 151 Dominican Republic 54.1% compare
  4. 153 Cote d'Ivoire 53.2% compare
  5. 154 Kenya 53.1% compare
  6. 155 Fiji 52.2% compare
  7. 155 Haiti 52.2% compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Peru

All data for Peru →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Peru?
Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Peru was 53.8% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Peru?
The highest recorded value was 53.8% in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Peru?
The lowest recorded value was 53.8% in 2003.
How does Peru rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
Peru ranks 152nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score rising or falling in Peru?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Peru data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Peru. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/peru/">Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Peru</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.