Peru vs Serbia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Peru
53.8%
in 2019
Serbia
55.6%
in 2019
Peru rank
151st
Serbia rank
148th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Peru
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 55.6% against 53.8% in Peru, a difference of 1.8%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 151st and Serbia ranks 148th of 190 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.8% | 66.4% | 12.6% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 53.8% | 60.4% | 6.6% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Peru or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 55.6% against 53.8% in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Peru and Serbia?
- 1.8%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Serbia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Peru and Serbia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Peru ranks 151st and Serbia ranks 148th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.