Haiti vs Peru: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Haiti
52.2%
in 2019
Peru
53.8%
in 2019
Haiti rank
154th
Peru rank
151st
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Haiti
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 53.8% against 52.2% in Haiti, a difference of 1.6%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Haiti ranks 154th and Peru ranks 151st of 190 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.2% | 53.8% | 1.6% | Peru |
| 2010s | 52.2% | 53.8% | 1.6% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Haiti or Peru?
- Peru, at 53.8% against 52.2% in Haiti as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Haiti and Peru?
- 1.6%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Peru?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Haiti and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Haiti ranks 154th and Peru ranks 151st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.