Botswana vs Peru: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Botswana
55.3%
in 2019
Peru
53.8%
in 2019
Botswana rank
147th
Peru rank
149th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Botswana
- Peru
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 55.3% against 53.8% in Peru, a difference of 1.5%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 147th and Peru ranks 149th of 188 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.3% | 53.8% | 1.6% | Botswana |
| 2010s | 55.3% | 53.8% | 1.6% | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Botswana or Peru?
- Botswana, at 55.3% against 53.8% in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Botswana and Peru?
- 1.5%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Peru?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Botswana and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Botswana ranks 147th and Peru ranks 149th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.