Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Fiji

Fiji: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score was 52.2% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
52.2%
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
155th
of 191 countries
All-time high
52.2%
in 2003
All-time low
52.2%
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Fiji, 2003–2019

02040602003201120192003: 52.22004: 52.22005: 52.22006: 52.22007: 52.22008: 52.22009: 52.22010: 52.22011: 52.22012: 52.22013: 52.22014: 52.22015: 52.22016: 52.22017: 52.22018: 52.22019: 52.2

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Fiji recorded 52.2% for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Fiji peaked at 52.2% in 2003 and was at its lowest, 52.2%, in 2003.

Fiji ranks 155th of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Fiji, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Fiji, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 52.2% —
2004 52.2% +0.0%
2005 52.2% +0.0%
2006 52.2% +0.0%
2007 52.2% +0.0%
2008 52.2% +0.0%
2009 52.2% +0.0%
2010 52.2% +0.0%
2011 52.2% +0.0%
2012 52.2% +0.0%
2013 52.2% +0.0%
2014 52.2% +0.0%
2015 52.2% +0.0%
2016 52.2% +0.0%
2017 52.2% +0.0%
2018 52.2% +0.0%
2019 52.2% +0.0%

Fiji compared with similar countries

  • Fiji's 52.2% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 67.7%, 77% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Fiji's 52.2% is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 64.9%, 80% of the median. (28 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 52.2% 52.2% 52.2% 7
2010s 52.2% 52.2% 52.2% 10

Countries ranked near Fiji

  1. 152 Peru 53.8% compare
  2. 153 Cote d'Ivoire 53.2% compare
  3. 154 Kenya 53.1% compare
  4. 155 Haiti 52.2% compare
  5. 157 Albania 52.1% compare
  6. 158 Venezuela 51.0% compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Fiji

All data for Fiji →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Fiji?
Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Fiji was 52.2% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Fiji?
The highest recorded value was 52.2% in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Fiji?
The lowest recorded value was 52.2% in 2003.
How does Fiji rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
Fiji ranks 155th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score rising or falling in Fiji?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Fiji data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Fiji. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/fiji/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/fiji/">Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Fiji</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.