Kenya vs Peru: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Kenya
53.1%
in 2019
Peru
53.8%
in 2019
Kenya rank
153rd
Peru rank
151st
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Kenya
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 53.8% against 53.1% in Kenya, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 153rd and Peru ranks 151st of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.6% | 53.8% | 11.9% | Kenya |
| 2010s | 53.1% | 53.8% | 0.7% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Kenya or Peru?
- Peru, at 53.8% against 53.1% in Kenya as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Kenya and Peru?
- 0.7%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Peru?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Kenya and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Kenya ranks 153rd and Peru ranks 151st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.