Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Guinea-Bissau

Guinea-Bissau: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score was 2 in 2018. β—† Volatile

Latest (2018)
2
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
84th
of 166 countries
All-time high
2
in 2000
All-time low
0
in 1994
Years of data
43
1974–2018

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Guinea-Bissau, 1974–2018

00.511.521974199620181974: 11975: 11976: 11977: 11978: 11979: 11980: 11981: 11982: 11983: 11984: 11985: 11986: 11987: 11988: 11989: 11990: 11991: 11992: 11993: 11994: 01995: 01996: 01997: 02000: 22001: 22002: 22003: 02004: 02005: 22006: 22007: 22008: 22009: 22010: 22011: 22012: 02013: 02014: 22015: 22016: 22017: 22018: 2

Source: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.

Analysis

The most recent figure for competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Guinea-Bissau is 2, measured in 2018. That is the highest value across all 43 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Guinea-Bissau peaked at 2 in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1994.

That places Guinea-Bissau 84th out of 166 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 1 1 1 6
1980s 1 1 1 10
1990s 0.5 0 1 8
2000s 1.6 0 2 10
2010s 1.56 0 2 9

Countries ranked near Guinea-Bissau

  1. 84 Armenia 2 compare
  2. 84 Bhutan 2 compare
  3. 84 Botswana 2 compare
  4. 84 Burkina Faso 2 compare
  5. 84 Central African Republic 2 compare
  6. 84 Cote d'Ivoire 2 compare
  7. 84 Gabon 2 compare
  8. 84 Gambia 2 compare
  9. 84 Guinea 2 compare
  10. 84 Haiti 2 compare
  11. 84 Iraq 2 compare
  12. 84 Israel 2 compare
  13. 84 Latvia 2 compare
  14. 84 Lebanon 2 compare
  15. 84 Madagascar 2 compare
  16. 84 Malawi 2 compare
  17. 84 Mali 2 compare
  18. 84 Mozambique 2 compare
  19. 84 Myanmar 2 compare
  20. 84 Namibia 2 compare
  21. 84 Nicaragua 2 compare
  22. 84 Niger 2 compare
  23. 84 Papua New Guinea 2 compare
  24. 84 Russia 2 compare
  25. 84 Singapore 2 compare
  26. 84 Somalia 2 compare
  27. 84 Suriname 2 compare
  28. 84 Tanzania 2 compare
  29. 84 Tunisia 2 compare
  30. 84 Ukraine 2 compare
  31. 84 Zimbabwe 2 compare

See the full ranking of 167 places β†’

More reference data data for Guinea-Bissau

All data for Guinea-Bissau β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Guinea-Bissau?
Competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Guinea-Bissau was 2 in 2018, according to Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest competitiveness of executive recruitment score recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
The highest recorded value was 2 in 2000.
What is the lowest competitiveness of executive recruitment score recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1994.
How does Guinea-Bissau rank for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 84th out of 166 countries with data for 2018.
Is competitiveness of executive recruitment score rising or falling in Guinea-Bissau?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Guinea-Bissau data come from?
The figures come from Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 43 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).