Burkina Faso vs Guinea-Bissau: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Burkina Faso
2
in 2018
Guinea-Bissau
2
in 2018
Burkina Faso rank
84th
Guinea-Bissau rank
84th
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 2 against 2 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 84th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 84th of 167 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.8 | 1 | 0.2 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 1980s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 1990s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 0 | 1.6 | 1.6 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 0.8889 | 1.56 | 0.6667 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Burkina Faso or Guinea-Bissau?
- Burkina Faso, at 2 against 2 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Burkina Faso and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Guinea-Bissau?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2018.
- How do Burkina Faso and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 84th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 84th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).